World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines update – IV – A quality appraisal with the AGREE II instrument

Agata Stróżyk; Marek Ruszczyński, MD; Andrea Horvath, MD; Lamia Dahdah, MD; Alessandro Fiocchi, MD; Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn, MD, PhD; Raanan Shamir, MD, PhD; Jonathan Spergel, MD, PhD; Yvan Vandenplas, MD, PhD; Carina Venter, PhD, RD; Hania Szajewska, MD

World Allergy Organization Journal (Feb 2022)

World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines update – IV – A quality appraisal with the AGREE II instrument

Agata Stróżyk,
Marek Ruszczyński, MD,
Andrea Horvath, MD,
Lamia Dahdah, MD,
Alessandro Fiocchi, MD,
Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn, MD, PhD,
Raanan Shamir, MD, PhD,
Jonathan Spergel, MD, PhD,
Yvan Vandenplas, MD, PhD,
Carina Venter, PhD, RD,
Hania Szajewska, MD

Affiliations

Agata Stróżyk: Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Marek Ruszczyński, MD: Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Andrea Horvath, MD: Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Lamia Dahdah, MD: Allergy Unit, Pediatric University Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
Alessandro Fiocchi, MD: Allergy Unit, Pediatric University Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn, MD, PhD: Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Childrens' Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
Raanan Shamir, MD, PhD: Institute for Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Lea and Arieh Pickel Chair for Pediatric Research, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petach Tikva, Israel
Jonathan Spergel, MD, PhD: Division of Allergy-Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Yvan Vandenplas, MD, PhD: KidZ Health Castle, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Carina Venter, PhD, RD: Section of Allergy and Immunology, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Hania Szajewska, MD: Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Corresponding author. Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 63A, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.

Journal volume & issue: Vol. 15, no. 2
p. 100613

Abstract

Read online

Background: Since the publication of The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines in 2010, a number of other guidelines, expert opinions, and position papers relating to the management of cow's milk allergy (CMA) have been published. We aimed to systematically review the quality of the guidelines on CMA diagnosis and management in children and/or adults published between 2010 and 2020. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, and Turning Research into Practice databases as well as website guideline repositories were searched from January 2010 until May 2020. Any clinical practice recommendations and/or guidelines focusing on the diagnosis and management of CMA in children and/or adults developed or endorsed by professional scientific societies or organizations were included. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool, a 23-item tool organized within 6 domains and 2 global rating items. Results: We included 12 guidelines; 8 were developed by national and 4 by international organizations. The quality scores for each domain varied: of all domains, the clarity of presentation domain had the highest median score (92%; Q1-Q3 81–100%), whereas rigor of development had the lowest median score (30%; Q1-Q3 15–67%). The median scores (Q1-Q3) for individual domains were as follows: scope and purpose 82% (70–99%), stakeholder involvement 63% (21–79%), rigor of development 30% (15–67%), clarity of presentation 92% (81–100%), applicability 68% (57–75%), and editorial independence 75% (69–100%). The median overall score was 70% (58–89%). Only 1 guideline (from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]) achieved top ratings (100%) in five domains and the overall score. Three guidelines (from the NICE, the British Society for Allergy & Clinical Immunology [BSACI] and WAO) achieved the highest ratings (100%) in at least 3 domains and the overall score. Conclusion: The majority of identified guidelines were of good or very good quality. However, the weakest point was the rigor of development domain, mostly due to unclear description of strengths and limitations of the body of evidence and the procedure for updating the guidelines.

Published in World Allergy Organization Journal

ISSN: 1939-4551 (Online)
Publisher: Elsevier
Country of publisher: Netherlands
LCC subjects: Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Immunologic diseases. Allergy
Website: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/world-allergy-organization-journal

About the journal

Abstract

Keywords