Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (Sep 2022)

Comparing core-genome MLST with PFGE and MLST for cluster analysis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

  • Tingting Li,
  • Yunxing Yang,
  • Rushuang Yan,
  • Peng Lan,
  • Haiyang Liu,
  • Ying Fu,
  • Xiaoting Hua,
  • Yan Jiang,
  • Zhihui Zhou,
  • Yunsong Yu

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30
pp. 148 – 151

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a prevalent pathogen contributing to hospital infections. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and core-genome MLST (cgMLST) are frequently used methods to illuminate the nosocomial transmission of CRAB. In this study, we compared the discriminatory power of the three typing methods. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the broth microdilution and Vitek2 methods. PFGE, MLST and cgMLST were conducted to determine the clonality and phylogenetic relationship of the strains. Whole-genome sequence data were acquired by an Illumina HiSeq 2000, and cgMLST was analysed by the Ridom SeqSphere+ v.7.2.3 software. Results: A total of 149 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates had 15 different PFGE profiles (A-O type), and 73 of the isolates had related subtypes (A1 and A2), accounting for the majority of type A isolates. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on the cgMLST genes grouped the same PFGE clonal pattern A into nine different clusters. ST_Pasteur grouped all the strains into ST2, whereas ST_Oxford grouped the PFGE clonal pattern A isolates into six STs. In addition, the gdhB allele in the ST_Oxford scheme had two copies in five strains, which complicated the ST_Oxford typing. Conclusions: cgMLST was more discriminant than PFGE and MLST. CgMLST is the most suitable and comprehensive method for genotyping A. baumannii in surveillance and epidemiological research.

Keywords