BMJ Open (Apr 2024)

Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review

  • Sameera Senanayake,
  • Zephanie Tyack,
  • Michelle Allen,
  • Steven M McPhail,
  • Bridget Abell,
  • Hannah Carter,
  • Kym Warhurst,
  • Sundresan Naicker

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078761
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Objectives This scoping review mapped and synthesised original research that identified low-value care in hospital settings as part of multicomponent processes.Design Scoping review.Data sources Electronic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature were last searched 11 July and 3 June 2022, respectively, with no language or date restrictions.Eligibility criteria We included original research targeting the identification and prioritisation of low-value care as part of a multicomponent process in hospital settings.Data extraction and synthesis Screening was conducted in duplicate. Data were extracted by one of six authors and checked by another author. A framework synthesis was conducted using seven areas of focus for the review and an overuse framework.Results Twenty-seven records were included (21 original studies, 4 abstracts and 2 reviews), originating from high-income countries. Benefit or value (11 records), risk or harm (10 records) were common concepts referred to in records that explicitly defined low-value care (25 records). Evidence of contextualisation including barriers and enablers of low-value care identification processes were identified (25 records). Common components of these processes included initial consensus, consultation, ranking exercise or list development (16 records), and reviews of evidence (16 records). Two records involved engagement of patients and three evaluated the outcomes of multicomponent processes. Five records referenced a theory, model or framework.Conclusions Gaps identified included applying systematic efforts to contextualise the identification of low-value care, involving people with lived experience of hospital care and initiatives in resource poor contexts. Insights were obtained regarding the theories, models and frameworks used to guide initiatives and ways in which the concept ‘low-value care’ had been used and reported. A priority for further research is evaluating the effect of initiatives that identify low-value care using contextualisation as part of multicomponent processes.