Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (Feb 2023)

Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus

  • S. Ingen-Housz-Oro,
  • V. Schmidt,
  • M. M. Ameri,
  • R. Abe,
  • A. Brassard,
  • A. Mostaghimi,
  • A. S. Paller,
  • A. Romano,
  • B. Didona,
  • B. H. Kaffenberger,
  • B. Ben Said,
  • B. Y. H. Thong,
  • B. Ramsay,
  • E. Brezinova,
  • B. Milpied,
  • C. G. Mortz,
  • C. Y. Chu,
  • C. Sotozono,
  • J. Gueudry,
  • D. G. Fortune,
  • S. M. Dridi,
  • D. Tartar,
  • G. Do-Pham,
  • E. Gabison,
  • E. J. Phillips,
  • F. Lewis,
  • C. Salavastru,
  • B. Horvath,
  • J. Dart,
  • J. Setterfield,
  • J. Newman,
  • J. T. Schulz,
  • A. Delcampe,
  • K. Brockow,
  • L. Seminario-Vidal,
  • L. Jörg,
  • M. P. Watson,
  • M. Gonçalo,
  • M. Lucas,
  • M. Torres,
  • M. H. Noe,
  • N. Hama,
  • N. H. Shear,
  • P. O’Reilly,
  • P. Wolkenstein,
  • P. Romanelli,
  • R. P. Dodiuk-Gad,
  • R. G. Micheletti,
  • G. S. Tiplica,
  • R. Sheridan,
  • S. Rauz,
  • S. Ahmad,
  • S. L. Chua,
  • T. H. Flynn,
  • W. Pichler,
  • S. T. Le,
  • E. Maverakis,
  • S. Walsh,
  • L. E. French,
  • M. C. Brüggen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking. Objectives We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae. Methods Participants were sent a survey via the online tool “Survey Monkey” consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as ‘appropriate’; four statements were considered ‘uncertain’, and ultimately finally discarded. Conclusions Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.

Keywords