BMJ Global Health (Jun 2021)

Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health

  • Dieter Wiek,
  • Richard Brown,
  • Andrew M Briggs,
  • Saurab Sharma,
  • James Waddell,
  • Anthony D Woolf,
  • Lyn March,
  • Helen Slater,
  • Enrique R Soriano,
  • Kristina E Åkesson,
  • Fiona M Blyth,
  • Ali Mobasheri,
  • Ben Horgan,
  • Helen E Foster,
  • Neil Betteridge,
  • Joanne E Jordan,
  • Anil Jain,
  • Francesca Gimigliano,
  • Nuzhat Ali,
  • Margareta C Nordin,
  • Shuichi Matsuda,
  • Carmen Huckel Schneider,
  • Sarika Parambath,
  • James J Young,
  • Deborah Kopansky-Giles,
  • Swatee Mishrra,
  • Joletta Belton,
  • Demelash Debere,
  • Karsten E Dreinhöfer,
  • Laura Finucane,
  • Scott Haldeman,
  • Syed A Haq,
  • Manjul Joshipura,
  • Asgar A Kalla,
  • Jakob Lothe,
  • Lillian Mwaniki,
  • Marilyn Pattison,
  • Felipe J J Reis,
  • Heather Tick

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 6

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Despite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health.Methods Design: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1–2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions.Results Phase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening.Conclusion An empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.