Journal of Translational Autoimmunity (Dec 2024)

Association of autoantibodies with the IFN signature and NETosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Ellen D. Kaan,
  • Tammo E. Brunekreef,
  • Julia Drylewicz,
  • Lucas L. van den Hoogen,
  • Maarten van der Linden,
  • Helen L. Leavis,
  • Jacob M. van Laar,
  • Michiel van der Vlist,
  • Henny G. Otten,
  • Maarten Limper

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9
p. 100246

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by a variety of disease symptoms and an unpredictable clinical course. To improve treatment outcome, stratification based on immunological manifestations commonly seen in patients with SLE such as autoantibodies, type I interferon (IFN) signature and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release may help. It is assumed that there is an association between these immunological phenomena, since NET release induces IFN production and IFN induces autoantibody formation via B-cell activation. Here we studied the association between autoantibodies, the IFN signature, NET release, and clinical manifestations in patients with SLE. Methods: We performed principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering of 57 SLE-related autoantibodies in 25 patients with SLE. We correlated each autoantibody to the IFN signature and NET inducing capacity. Results: We observed two distinct clusters: one cluster contained mostly patients with a high IFN signature. Patients in this cluster often present with cutaneous lupus, and have higher anti-dsDNA concentrations. Another cluster contained a mix of patients with a high and low IFN signature. Patients with high and low NET inducing capacity were equally distributed between the clusters. Variance between the clusters is mainly driven by antibodies against histones, RibP2, RibP0, EphB2, RibP1, PCNA, dsDNA, and nucleosome. In addition, we found a trend towards increased concentrations of autoantibodies against EphB2, RibP1, and RNP70 in patients with an IFN signature. We found a negative correlation of NET inducing capacity with anti-FcER (r = −0.530; p = 0.007) and anti-PmScl100 (r = −0.445; p = 0.03). Conclusion: We identified a subgroup of patients with an IFN signature that express increased concentrations of antibodies against DNA and RNA-binding proteins, which can be useful for further patient stratification and a more targeted therapy. We did not find positive associations between autoantibodies and NET inducing capacity. Our study further strengthens the evidence of a correlation between RNA-binding autoantibodies and the IFN signature.

Keywords