Oftalʹmologiâ (Apr 2024)

Systemic Arterial Hypertension and Ophthalmohypertension as Independent Risk Factors for Poor Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy with Line 1 Drugs in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

  • V. G. Likhvantseva,
  • A. S. Gevorgyan,
  • S. G. Kapkova,
  • S. I. Rychkova,
  • T. E. Borisenko

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2024-1-117-127
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 117 – 127

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: to assess hypertension as a risk factor for a poor response to antiangiogenic therapy.Patients and methods. Systemic blood pressure was studied in 84 patients (92 eyes) with age-related macular degeneration who were treated with intravitreal injections of Eilea in a fixed mode.Results. It was found that significantly more often a poor response to treatment in the form of partial non-resposing or progression of the disease, despite treatment, is associated with elevated diastolic blood pressure (DBP, p = 0.01). An increase in systolic (SBP) blood pressure in patients with arterial hypertension and AMD is accompanied by an increase in eye perfusion pressure (p < 0.01), which apparently worsens the absorption of angiostatics and causes a poor response to treatment. According to the results of the study, the most favorable corridor of SBP values associated with ideal response is in the range of values of 104–140 mm Hg, and DBP is in the range of 68–80 mm Hg st., which should be taken as the recommended parameters of blood pressure in patients with nVMD receiving a course of treatment for Eylea. Intraocular pressure (IOP) has demonstrated itself as a second modifiable independent and independent risk factor for poor response to treatment with nVMD with line 1 anti-VEGF therapy drugs. Intraocular pressure (IOP) has demonstrated itself as a second modifiable independent and independent risk factor for poor response to nVMD treatment with line 1 anti-VEGF therapy drugs. The biomarker associated with the ideal response was — 12.6 mm Hg, and the corridor of recommended values — 11–21 mm Hg. An increase in ophthalmotonus with the output of personalized values beyond this corridor seems to worsen the outcome of treatment.Conclusion. The identification of modifiable risk factors is extremely important in practical ophthalmology, as it opens up the possibility of increasing the patient’s chances of a better treatment outcome. Modifiable risk factors are valuable and powerful tools that replenish our arsenal. Information about them is important not only in the treatment of AMD, but can also be the patient’s motivation for switching to a healthy lifestyle and reducing the risk of developing the disease.

Keywords