JTCVS Open (Dec 2023)

Pacemaker implantation following tricuspid valve annuloplastyCentral MessagePerspective

  • Sigurdur Ragnarsson, MD, PhD,
  • Amar Taha, MD, PhD,
  • Susanne J. Nielsen, RN, PhD,
  • Andrea Amabile, MD,
  • Arnar Geirsson, MD,
  • Markus Krane, MD, PhD,
  • David Mörtsell, MD, PhD,
  • Johan Sjögren, MD, PhD,
  • Anders Jeppsson, MD, PhD,
  • Andreas Martinsson, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16
pp. 276 – 289

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Tricuspid annuloplasty is associated with increased risk of atrioventricular block and subsequent implantation of a permanent pacemaker. However, the exact incidence of permanent pacemaker, associated risk factors, and outcomes in this frame remain debated. The aim of the study was to report permanent pacemaker incidence, risk factors, and outcomes after tricuspid annuloplasty from nationwide databases. Methods: By using data from multiple Swedish mandatory national registries, all patients (n = 1502) who underwent tricuspid annuloplasty in Sweden from 2006 to 2020 were identified. Patients who needed permanent pacemaker within 30 days from surgery were compared with those who did not. The cumulative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was estimated. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to identify risk factors of 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation. The association between permanent pacemaker implantation and long-term survival was evaluated with multivariable Cox regression. Results: The 30-day permanent pacemaker rate was 14.2% (214/1502). Patients with permanent pacemakers were older (69.8 ± 10.3 years vs 67.5 ± 12.4 years, P = .012). Independent risk factors of permanent pacemaker implantation were concomitant mitral valve surgery (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.34-3.27), ablation surgery (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23), and surgery performed in a low-volume center (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.17-2.83). Permanent pacemaker implantation was not associated with increased long-term mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03). Conclusions: This nationwide study demonstrated a high risk of permanent pacemaker implantation within 30 days of tricuspid annuloplasty. However, patients who needed a permanent pacemaker did not have worse long-term survival, and the cumulative incidence of heart failure and major adverse cardiovascular events was similar to patients who did not receive a permanent pacemaker.

Keywords