BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Feb 2022)

Regional variation in coronary angiography rates: the association with supply factors and the role of indication: a spatial analysis

  • Julia Frank-Tewaag,
  • Julian Bleek,
  • Christian Günster,
  • Udo Schneider,
  • Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag,
  • Ursula Marschall,
  • Sebastian Franke,
  • Kathrin Schlößler,
  • Norbert Donner-Banzhoff,
  • Leonie Sundmacher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02513-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Coronary angiographies (CAs) are among the most common diagnostic procedures carried out in German hospitals, and substantial regional differences in their frequency of use have been documented. Given the heterogeneity with regard to the expected benefits and the varying scope for discretion depending on the indication for the procedure, we hypothesized that the observed variation and the association of need and supply factors differs by indication for CA. Methods We investigated the correlation between supply factors and the regional rates of CAs in Germany while controlling for need using spatial‐autoregressive error models (SARE) and spatial cross-regressive models with autoregressive errors (SCRARE). The overall rates of CAs and the rates in specific patient subgroups, namely, patients with and without myocardial infarction (MI), were calculated based on a comprehensive set of nationwide routine data from three statutory health insurances at the district level. Results Although little variation was found in cases with MI, considerable variation was seen in the overall cases and cases without MI. The SARE models revealed a positive association between the number of hospitals with a cardiac catheterization laboratory per 10,000 population and the rates of overall cases and cases without MI, whereas no such relationship existed in cases with MI. Additionally, an association between regional deprivation and the rates of CAs was found in cases with MI, but no such association was seen in cases without MI. Conclusions The results supported the hypothesis that the relative association of need and supply factors differed by the indication for CA. Although the regional differences in the frequency of use of CAs can only be explained in part by the factors examined in our study, it offers insight into patient access to and the provision of CA services and can provide a platform for further local research.

Keywords