Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (Jun 2022)

Genomic Insights Into the Demographic History of the Southern Chinese

  • Xiufeng Huang,
  • Zi-Yang Xia,
  • Zi-Yang Xia,
  • Zi-Yang Xia,
  • Zi-Yang Xia,
  • Xiaoyun Bin,
  • Guanglin He,
  • Guanglin He,
  • Guanglin He,
  • Jianxin Guo,
  • Jianxin Guo,
  • Jianxin Guo,
  • Atif Adnan,
  • Atif Adnan,
  • Atif Adnan,
  • Lianfei Yin,
  • Youyi Huang,
  • Jing Zhao,
  • Jing Zhao,
  • Jing Zhao,
  • Yidong Yang,
  • Fuwei Ma,
  • Yingxiang Li,
  • Rong Hu,
  • Tianle Yang,
  • Lan-Hai Wei,
  • Chuan-Chao Wang,
  • Chuan-Chao Wang,
  • Chuan-Chao Wang,
  • Chuan-Chao Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.853391
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Southern China is the birthplace of rice-cultivating agriculture and different language families and has also witnessed various human migrations that facilitated cultural diffusions. The fine-scale demographic history in situ that forms present-day local populations, however, remains unclear. To comprehensively cover the genetic diversity in East and Southeast Asia, we generated genome-wide SNP data from 211 present-day Southern Chinese and co-analyzed them with ∼1,200 ancient and modern genomes. In Southern China, language classification is significantly associated with genetic variation but with a different extent of predictability, and there is strong evidence for recent shared genetic history particularly in Hmong–Mien and Austronesian speakers. A geography-related genetic sub-structure that represents the major genetic variation in Southern East Asians is established pre-Holocene and its extremes are represented by Neolithic Fujianese and First Farmers in Mainland Southeast Asia. This sub-structure is largely reduced by admixture in ancient Southern Chinese since > ∼2,000 BP, which forms a “Southern Chinese Cluster” with a high level of genetic homogeneity. Further admixture characterizes the demographic history of the majority of Hmong–Mien speakers and some Kra-Dai speakers in Southwest China happened ∼1,500–1,000 BP, coeval to the reigns of local chiefdoms. In Yellow River Basin, we identify a connection of local populations to genetic sub-structure in Southern China with geographical correspondence appearing > ∼9,000 BP, while the gene flow likely closely related to “Southern Chinese Cluster” since the Longshan period (∼5,000–4,000 BP) forms ancestry profile of Han Chinese Cline.

Keywords