Comparison of electrocardiographic versus echocardiographic detection of left ventricular mass changes over time and evaluation of new onset left ventricular hypertrophy

Abstract

Abstract We assessed the value of 3 electrocardiographic (EKG) voltage criteria in detecting variations of left ventricular mass (LVM) over time, taking echocardiographic (ECHO) LVM as reference, in the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni study. In 927 subjects (age 47 ± 13 years on entry, 49.9% men) an ECHO evaluation of LVM and EKG suitable for measurement of EKG‐LVH criteria (Sokolow‐Lyon voltage, Cornell voltage and R‐wave voltage in aVL) were available at baseline and at a 2nd evaluation performed 10 years later. Δ (delta) LVM, Δ LVMI, and Δ EKG parameters values were calculated from 2nd evaluation to baseline. The sensitivity of the EKG criteria in the diagnosis of LVH, poor at baseline, becomes even worse after 10 years, reaching very low values. Only the sensitivity of R‐wave amplitude exhibited slight increase over time but with unsatisfactory absolute values. Despite the prevalence of ECHO‐LVH at the 2nd evaluation was threefold increased compared to baseline (29.3% and 33.7% for LVM indexed to BSA and height2.7, respectively), the prevalence of EKG‐LVH was unchanged when evaluated by Sokolow‐Lyon criteria, significantly reduced when assessed by Cornell voltage index, while significantly increased using R‐wave voltage in aVL criteria. Despite an ECHO‐LVM increase over the time, mean EKG changes were of opposite sign, except for R‐wave amplitude in aVL. Our study highlights the discrepancy between ECHO and EKG in monitoring LVM changes over the time, especially for Sokolow‐Lyon and Cornell voltage. Thus, EKG is an unsuitable method for the longitudinal evaluation of LVM variations.

Keywords

• echocardiography
• electrocardiography
• left ventricular hypertrophy
• left ventricular mass