Gut and Liver (Mar 2018)

Fecal Immunochemical Test and Fecal Calprotectin Results Show Different Profiles in Disease Monitoring for Ulcerative Colitis

  • Sakiko Hiraoka,
  • Toshihiro Inokuchi,
  • Asuka Nakarai,
  • Shiho Takashima,
  • Daisuke Takei,
  • Yuusaku Sugihara,
  • Masahiro Takahara,
  • Keita Harada,
  • Hiroyuki Okada,
  • Jun Kato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17013
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
pp. 142 – 148

Abstract

Read online

Background/AimsBoth fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (Fcal) results are useful biomarkers for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the situations in which each marker should be used are largely unknown.Methods : A total of 110 colonoscopy intervals of UC patients were assessed, and correlations between changes in colonoscopic findings and changes in the two aforementioned fecal markers were examined.Results : Among patients with mucosal healing (MH) and negative FIT or Fcal results at the initial colonoscopy, FIT and Fcal findings exhibited accuracies of 93% (38/41) and 79% (26/33), respectively, for predicting the results of the subsequent examination. Among the 24 patients who showed endoscopic activity at the precedent colonoscopy and MH at the subsequent examination, positive-to-negative conversion of FIT and Fcal findings at the subsequent examination was observed in 92% (12/13) and 62% (8/13) of patients, respectively. Among the 43 patients who showed endoscopic activity at both the precedent and subsequent examinations, Fcal findings reflected the change in endoscopic activity better than FIT results (r=0.59, p<0.0001 vs r=0.30, p=0.054).Conclusion : sThe FIT is useful for confirming MH and the occurrence of relapse. In contrast, Fcal is useful for monitoring the mucosal status of patients with active inflammation.

Keywords