BMC Anesthesiology (Aug 2017)

Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease

  • Yunlong Zhang,
  • Wendong Lin,
  • Sheliang Shen,
  • Hongfa Wang,
  • Xiaona Feng,
  • Jiehao Sun

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0397-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background It is skeptical about cardioprotective property of sevoflurane in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, especially in the elderly patients with coronary heart disease. We hypothesized that long duration of sevoflurane inhalation in noncardiac surgery could ameliorate myocardial damage in such patients. Methods This was a randomized, prospective study. One hundred twenty-one elderly patients with coronary heart disease were randomly allocated into two groups. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved by sevoflurane inhalation (Group S) or propofol-remifentanil respectively (Group PR). Serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured before anesthesia induction (T0), 8 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) after anesthesia respectively. The perioperative cardiac output, complications and postoperative 3-month follow-up from end of surgery were recorded. Results Between the two groups, there were no statistical differences in the values of cTnI and BNP during the study. However, The area under the curve of cTnI values over 24 h after operation was less in Group S. Group PR had lower cardiac output and consumed more amount of phenylephrine during the study (P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the group PR, sevoflurane had no benefit in the myocardial protection for the elderly patients with CHD. However, Sevoflurane showed advantage in maintaining hemodynamic stability during the operative period. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-16008871 , 21 July 2016.

Keywords