BMC Medicine (Jan 2024)

The quality of care delivered to residents in long-term care in Australia: an indicator-based review of resident records (CareTrack Aged study)

  • Peter D. Hibbert,
  • Charlotte J. Molloy,
  • Ian D. Cameron,
  • Leonard C. Gray,
  • Richard L. Reed,
  • Louise K. Wiles,
  • Johanna Westbrook,
  • Gaston Arnolda,
  • Rebecca Bilton,
  • Ruby Ash,
  • Andrew Georgiou,
  • Alison Kitson,
  • Clifford F. Hughes,
  • Susan J. Gordon,
  • Rebecca J. Mitchell,
  • Frances Rapport,
  • Carole Estabrooks,
  • Gregory L. Alexander,
  • Charles Vincent,
  • Adrian Edwards,
  • Andrew Carson-Stevens,
  • Cordula Wagner,
  • Brendan McCormack,
  • Jeffrey Braithwaite

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03224-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background This study estimated the prevalence of evidence-based care received by a population-based sample of Australian residents in long-term care (LTC) aged ≥ 65 years in 2021, measured by adherence to clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations. Methods Sixteen conditions/processes of care amendable to estimating evidence-based care at a population level were identified from prevalence data and CPGs. Candidate recommendations (n = 5609) were extracted from 139 CPGs which were converted to indicators. National experts in each condition rated the indicators via the RAND-UCLA Delphi process. For the 16 conditions, 236 evidence-based care indicators were ratified. A multi-stage sampling of LTC facilities and residents was undertaken. Trained aged-care nurses then undertook manual structured record reviews of care delivered between 1 March and 31 May 2021 (our record review period) to assess adherence with the indicators. Results Care received by 294 residents with 27,585 care encounters in 25 LTC facilities was evaluated. Residents received care for one to thirteen separate clinical conditions/processes of care (median = 10, mean = 9.7). Adherence to evidence-based care indicators was estimated at 53.2% (95% CI: 48.6, 57.7) ranging from a high of 81.3% (95% CI: 75.6, 86.3) for Bladder and Bowel to a low of 12.2% (95% CI: 1.6, 36.8) for Depression. Six conditions (skin integrity, end-of-life care, infection, sleep, medication, and depression) had less than 50% adherence with indicators. Conclusions This is the first study of adherence to evidence-based care for people in LTC using multiple conditions and a standardised method. Vulnerable older people are not receiving evidence-based care for many physical problems, nor care to support their mental health nor for end-of-life care. The six conditions in which adherence with indicators was less than 50% could be the focus of improvement efforts.

Keywords