Scientific Reports (Feb 2024)

Cyclosporine A in hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients to prevent the development of interstitial lung disease: a pilot randomized clinical trial

  • Tatiana Cobo-Ibáñez,
  • Gemma Mora Ortega,
  • Carlos Sánchez-Piedra,
  • Gonzalo Serralta-San Martín,
  • Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo,
  • Vanesa Lores Gutiérrez,
  • Llanos Soler Rangel,
  • Cristina García Yubero,
  • Ana Esteban-Vázquez,
  • Elena López-Aspiroz,
  • Cristina Andreu Vázquez,
  • Inmaculada Toboso,
  • Blanca María Martínez Alonso de Armiño,
  • Rocío Alejandra Olivares Alviso,
  • Rocío Calderón Nieto,
  • Cecilia Yañez,
  • Marlín Alejandra Zakhour González,
  • Tatiana Sainz Sánchez,
  • Silvia Arroyo de la Torre,
  • Nazaret Del Amo Del Arco,
  • Jorge Francisco Gómez-Cerezo,
  • Teresa Ramírez Prieto,
  • Alicia Martínez Hernández,
  • Santiago Muñoz-Fernández

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54196-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Post-COVID-19 interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a new entity that frequently causes pulmonary fibrosis and can become chronic. We performed a single-center parallel-group open-label pilot randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) in the development of ILD in the medium term among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive CsA plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary composite outcome was the percentage of patients without ILD 3 months after diagnosis of pneumonia and not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (response without requiring IMV). The key secondary composite outcomes were the percentage of patients who achieve a response requiring IMV or irrespective of the need for IMV, and adverse events. A total of 33 patients received at least one dose of CsA plus standard of care (n = 17) or standard of care alone (n = 16). No differences were found between the groups in the percentage of patients who achieved a response without requiring IMV or a response requiring IMV. A higher percentage of patients achieved a response irrespective of the need for IMV in the CsA plus standard of care group although the RR was almost significant 2.833 (95% CI, 0.908–8.840; p = 0.057). No differences were found between the groups for adverse events. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, we were unable to demonstrate that CsA achieved a significant effect in preventing the development of ILD. (EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT Number: 2020-002123-11; registration date: 08/05/2020).