PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (Apr 2024)

Comparison of two approaches to measuring clean faces as part of the facial cleanliness component of the SAFE trachoma elimination strategy.

  • Sheila K West,
  • Beatriz Munoz,
  • Harran Mkocha,
  • Matthew C Lynch,
  • Catherine Gracewello,
  • Mabula Kasubi,
  • Meraf A Wolle

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012090
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 4
p. e0012090

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma (GET) endorses the full SAFE strategy to eliminate trachoma; Surgery (for trichiasis), Antibiotics (to reduce the community pool of infection, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvement (to decrease transmission). There is no accepted measure of facial cleanliness. This study compared two possible metrics for facial cleanliness.Method/findingsMetric one: Clean face was defined as observed absence of ocular and nasal discharge on the face. Metric two: observing a grade of dirtiness (scale 10 = lightest to 0 = darkest) on a standard facial wipe. The reliability of grading a child's face or grading a facial wipe was determined in children in Kongwa Tanzania. We also observed both measurements in a cohort of 202 children ages 1 to ConclusionsThe two metrics were equally reliable, and both measured the behavior of face washing. They measure different aspects of a clean face; one measures the amount of dirt on wiped area and the other measures ocular and nasal discharge. Both measurements appear to capture the behavior of facial cleaning, and the choice of metric would appear to rest on the measurement that captures the stated objective of the behavior, consideration of costs, training, logistics, and implementation.