BMJ Open (Jul 2023)

Older adults’ medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland

  • Gian Domenico Borasio,
  • Clément Meier,
  • Sarah Vilpert,
  • Jürgen Maurer,
  • Jeanne Berche,
  • Ralf J. Jox

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071444
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 7

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Medical decision-making at the end of life is common and should be as patient-centred as possible. Our study investigates older adults’ preferences towards three medical treatments that are frequently included in advance directive forms and their association with social, regional and health characteristics.Setting A cross-sectional study using population-based data of wave 8 (2019/2020) of the Swiss component of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.Participants 1430 adults aged 58 years and older living in Switzerland.Primary and secondary outcome measures Three questions on the preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); life-prolonging treatment in case of high risk of permanent mental incapacity; reduced awareness (sedation) to relieve unbearable pain and symptoms. Their associations with individuals’ social, regional and health characteristics.Results Most older adults expressed a wish to receive CPR (58.6%) and to forgo life-prolonging treatment in case of permanent mental incapacity (92.2%). Most older adults also indicated that they would accept reduced awareness if necessary to receive effective treatment for pain and distressing symptoms (59.2%). Older adults’ treatment preferences for CPR and life-prolonging treatment differed according to sex, age, partnership status, linguistic region and health status, while willingness to accept reduced awareness for effective symptom treatment was more similarly distributed across population groups.Conclusions Simultaneous preferences for CPR and refusal of life-prolonging treatment might appear to be conflicting treatment goals. Considering individuals’ values and motivations can help clarify ambivalent treatment decisions. Structured advance care planning processes with trained professionals allows for exploring individuals’ motivations and values and helps to identify congruent care and treatment goals.