Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Mar 2024)

High-resolution mapping of nitrogen oxide emissions in large US cities from TROPOMI retrievals of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns

  • F. Liu,
  • F. Liu,
  • S. Beirle,
  • J. Joiner,
  • S. Choi,
  • S. Choi,
  • Z. Tao,
  • Z. Tao,
  • K. E. Knowland,
  • K. E. Knowland,
  • S. J. Smith,
  • D. Q. Tong,
  • D. Q. Tong,
  • S. Ma,
  • S. Ma,
  • Z. T. Fasnacht,
  • Z. T. Fasnacht,
  • T. Wagner

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3717-2024
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24
pp. 3717 – 3728

Abstract

Read online

Satellite-derived spatiotemporal patterns of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions can improve accuracy of emission inventories to better support air quality and climate research and policy studies. In this study, we develop a new method by coupling the chemical transport Model-Independent SATellite-derived Emission estimation Algorithm for Mixed-sources (MISATEAM) with a divergence method to map high-resolution NOx emissions across US cities using TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) retrievals. The accuracy of the coupled method is validated through application to synthetic NO2 observations from the NASA-Unified Weather Research and Forecasting (NU-WRF) model, with a horizontal spatial resolution of 4 km × 4 km for 33 large and mid-size US cities. Validation reveals excellent agreement between inferred and NU-WRF-provided emission magnitudes (R= 0.99, normalized mean bias, NMB = −0.01) and a consistent spatial pattern when comparing emissions for individual grid cells (R=0.88±0.06). We then develop a TROPOMI-based database reporting annual emissions for 39 US cities at a horizontal spatial resolution of 0.05° × 0.05° from 2018 to 2021. This database demonstrates a strong correlation (R= 0.90) with the National Emission Inventory (NEI) but reveals some bias (NMB = −0.24). There are noticeable differences in the spatial patterns of emissions in some cities. Our analysis suggests that uncertainties in TROPOMI-based emissions and potential misallocation of emissions and/or missing sources in bottom-up emission inventories both contribute to these differences.