Automated expiratory ventilation assistance through a small endotracheal tube can improve venous return and cardiac output

Abstract

Abstract Background Positive pressure ventilation can decrease venous return and cardiac output. It is not known if expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) through a small endotracheal tube can improve venous return and cardiac output. Results In a porcine model, switching from conventional positive pressure ventilation to (EVA) with − 8 cmH20 expiratory pressure increased the venous return and cardiac output. The stroke volume increased by 27% when the subjects were switched from conventional ventilation to EVA [53.8 ± 7.7 (SD) vs. 68.1 ± 7.7 ml, p = 0.003]. After hemorrhage, subjects treated with EVA had higher median cardiac output, higher mean systemic arterial pressure, and lower central venous pressure at 40 and 60 min when compared with subjects treated with conventional ventilation with PEEP 0 cmH20. The median cardiac output was 41% higher in the EVA group than the control group at 60 min [2.70 vs. 1.59 L/min, p = 0.029]. Conclusion EVA through a small endotracheal tube increased venous return, cardiac output, and mean arterial pressure compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation. The effects were most significant during hypovolemia from hemorrhage. EVA provided less effective ventilation than conventional positive pressure ventilation.

Keywords

• Cardiac output
• Venous return
• Negative pressure ventilation
• Hemorrhage
• Expiratory ventilation assistance