Clinical Epidemiology (May 2022)

Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in End-of-Life Care for Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients: Are We Closing the Gap?

  • Vestergaard AHS,
  • Christiansen CF,
  • Neergaard MA,
  • Valentin JB,
  • Johnsen SP

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 14
pp. 653 – 664

Abstract

Read online

Anne Høy Seemann Vestergaard,1 Christian Fynbo Christiansen,1 Mette Asbjoern Neergaard,2 Jan Brink Valentin,3 Søren Paaske Johnsen3 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark; 2Palliative Care Unit & Child and Youth Palliative Care Team, Oncology Department, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark; 3Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg Ø, 9220, DenmarkCorrespondence: Anne Høy Seemann Vestergaard, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark, Tel +45 87168434, Fax +45 87167215, Email [email protected]: Socioeconomic disparities in end-of-life care have been reported across underlying diseases, but there is a paucity of information on potential time trends. Thus, we aimed to examine time trends in use of health-care services at the end of life according to socioeconomic position in patients dying from cancer and non-cancer diseases.Materials and Methods: We conducted a nationwide registry-based study among adults dying from cancer or non-cancer diseases (diabetes, dementia, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, chronic liver disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in Denmark in 2006– 2016. We obtained data on patients’ educational level and income level and use of health-care services within three months before death. Use of health-care services according to educational level and income level was plotted by calendar year of death and compared by regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, cohabitation, and municipality.Results: In both cancer (n = 169,694) and non-cancer patients (n = 180,350), we found limited socioeconomic disparities and no clear temporal trends in use of hospital, intensive care, emergency room, general practice, home care nurse, and hospice. In 2006/2007, one percentage point more cancer patients with high income level compared with low income level were affiliated with hospital-based specialist palliative care (adjusted mean difference: 0.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01; 0.02)), whereas this was 12 percentage points in 2016 (adjusted mean difference: 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09; 0.14)).Conclusion: Socioeconomic disparities in specialist palliative care tended to increase over time among cancer patients but were limited and without clear time trends in use of other health-care services in both cancer and non-cancer patients.Keywords: chronic disease, death, hospitals, neoplasms, palliative care, socioeconomic factors

Keywords