Frontiers in Public Health (Nov 2022)

Maternal choices and preferences for screening strategies of gestational diabetes mellitus: A exploratory study using discrete choice experiment

  • Tingting Xu,
  • Tingting Xu,
  • Yan Jiang,
  • Xiuyan Guo,
  • Julie A. Campbell,
  • Hasnat Ahmad,
  • Qing Xia,
  • Xiaozhen Lai,
  • Di Yan,
  • Liangkun Ma,
  • Hai Fang,
  • Andrew J. Palmer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.864482
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

AimsThis study aimed to investigate maternal preferences for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening options in rural China to identify an optimal GDM screening strategy.MethodsPregnant women at 24–28 gestational weeks were recruited from Shandong province, China. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit pregnant women's preferences for GDM screening strategy defined by five attributes: number of blood draws, out-of-pocket costs, screening waiting-time, number of hospital visits, and positive diagnosis rate. A mixed logistic model was employed to quantify maternal preferences, and to estimate the relative importance of included attributes in determining pregnant women's preferences for two routinely applied screening strategies (“one-step”: 75 g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] and “two-step”: 50 g glucose challenge-test plus 75 g OGTT). Preference heterogeneity was also investigated.ResultsN = 287 participants completed the DCE survey. All five predefined attributes were associated with pregnant women's preferences. Diagnostic rate was the most influential attribute (17.5 vs. 8.0%, OR: 2.89; 95%CI: 2.10 to 3.96). When changes of the attributes of “two-step” to “one-step” strategies, women's uptake probability from full “two-step” to “one-step” significantly increased with 71.3% (95%CI: 52.2 to 90.1%), but no significant difference with the first step of “two-step” (−31.0%, 95%CI: −70.2 to 8.1%).ConclusionChinese pregnant women preferred the “one-step” screening strategy to the full “two-step” strategy, but were indifferent between “one-step” and the first step of “two-step” strategies.

Keywords