Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (Dec 2022)

Blood Mucorales PCR to track down Aspergillus and Mucorales co-infections in at-risk hematology patients: A case-control study

  • Robina Aerts,
  • Robina Aerts,
  • Sien Bevers,
  • Kurt Beuselinck,
  • Alexander Schauwvlieghe,
  • Katrien Lagrou,
  • Katrien Lagrou,
  • Johan Maertens,
  • Johan Maertens

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1080921
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionSerum Mucorales PCR can precede the final diagnosis of invasive mucormycosis by several days or weeks and could therefore be useful as a non-invasive screening tool.MethodsWe assessed the performance of a commercial Mucorales PCR assay (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) on prospectively collected banked sera from hematology patients at risk for invasive mould infections. We evaluated if there is an underestimated incidence of missed Mucorales co-infections in patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA). We tested Mucorales PCR on the sera of all patients with a diagnosis of at least possible IA (EORTC-MSGERC consensus criteria) before the start of any antifungal therapy, and in a control group of similar high-risk hematology patients without IA (in a 1:4 ratio). When a positive Mucorales PCR was observed, at least 5 serum samples taken before and after the positive one were selected.ResultsMucorales PCR was performed in 46 diagnostic serum samples of cases and in 184 controls. Serum Mucorales PCR was positive in 4 cases of IA (8.7%; 12.9% of probable cases) and in 1 control case (0.5%) (p=0.0061, OR=17.43 (1.90-159.96). Post-mortem cultures of the positive control became positive for Rhizopus arrhizus. Mortality of IA cases with and without a positive Mucorales PCR was not significantly different. Only in the PCR positive control case, serial serum samples before and after the diagnostic sample were also positive.DiscussionIt is not entirely clear what a positive Mucorales PCR in these cases implies since the 4 Mucorales PCR positive cases were treated with antifungals with activity against Mucorales. In addition, PCR was positive only once. This study does not provide enough evidence to implement Mucorales PCR screening. However, our findings emphasize once more the importance of considering the possibility of dual mould infections, even in patients with a positive galactomannan detection.

Keywords