Respiratory Research (Apr 2010)

Are exhaled nitric oxide measurements using the portable NIOX MINO repeatable?

  • Raza Abid,
  • Drew Kirsty,
  • Pike Katy,
  • Grundy Jane,
  • Clayton Bernie,
  • Selby Anna,
  • Kurukulaaratchy Ramesh,
  • Arshad S Hasan,
  • Roberts Graham

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-43
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
p. 43

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Exhaled nitric oxide is a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation and a portable analyser, the NIOX MINO (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden), is now available. This study aimed to assess the reproducibility of the NIOX MINO measurements across age, sex and lung function for both absolute and categorical exhaled nitric oxide values in two distinct groups of children and teenagers. Methods Paired exhaled nitric oxide readings were obtained from 494 teenagers, aged 16-18 years, enrolled in an unselected birth cohort and 65 young people, aged 6-17 years, with asthma enrolled in an interventional asthma management study. Results The birth cohort participants showed a high degree of variability between first and second exhaled nitric oxide readings (mean intra-participant difference 1.37 ppb, 95% limits of agreement -7.61 to 10.34 ppb), although there was very close agreement when values were categorised as low, normal, intermediate or high (kappa = 0.907, p Conclusions The reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide is poor for absolute values but acceptable when values are categorised as low, normal, intermediate or high in children and teenagers. One measurement is therefore sufficient when using categorical exhaled nitric oxide values to direct asthma management but a mean of at least two measurements is required for absolute values.