Arthroplasty Today (Feb 2023)

Routine Pathologic Examination of the Femoral Head in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Survey Study of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

  • Sumon Nandi, MD, MBA,
  • Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS,
  • Muyibat A. Adelani, MD,
  • Timothy S. Brown, MD,
  • John C. Clohisy, MD,
  • P. Maxwell Courtney, MD,
  • Matthew J. Dietz, MD,
  • Brett R. Levine, MD, MS,
  • Simon C. Mears, MD, PhD,
  • Jesse E. Otero, MD, PhD,
  • Ran Schwarzkopf, MD, MSc,
  • Thorsten M. Seyler, MD, PhD,
  • Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19
p. 101079

Abstract

Read online

Background: Current literature does not provide conclusive evidence on whether routine pathologic examination of femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty is indicated or cost-effective. As a result, there is substantial variation in opinion among surgeons related to this issue. Our study aim was to determine factors that impact surgeon propensity to order pathologic examination of femoral heads. Methods: A 12-question survey was created to evaluate surgeon practices, indications, and patient care implications surrounding routine pathologic examination of femoral heads. The email survey was distributed to all members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (n = 2598). Results: There were 572 survey respondents. Out of all respondents, 28.4% always send femoral heads to pathology, and 27.6% reported an institutional requirement to do so. Of the 572 surgeons, 73.6% report femoral head pathology has never resulted in a change in patient disease course. Factors that increase the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination include institutional requirements, medicolegal concern, and prior experience with femoral head pathologic examination changing patients' disease course (P < .001). Cost concern decreases the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination (P = .0012). Conclusions: A minority of surgeons routinely send femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty for pathologic examination, mostly because of institutional requirement. The majority of surgeons feel that femoral head pathologic examination never changes patient management, although others have infrequently detected malignancy and infection. Institutional policy, concern for litigation, and prior experience with discordant pathologic diagnoses increase femoral head pathologic examinations, while cost concern decreases them.

Keywords