Journal of Clinical Medicine (Dec 2023)

Diagnostic Utility of a Combined MPO/D-Dimer Score to Distinguish Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm from Peripheral Artery Disease

  • Branislav Zagrapan,
  • Johannes Klopf,
  • Nihan Dide Celem,
  • Annika Brandau,
  • Patrick Rossi,
  • Yulia Gordeeva,
  • Alexandra Regina Szewczyk,
  • Linda Liu,
  • Diana Ahmadi-Fazel,
  • Sina Najarnia,
  • Lukas Fuchs,
  • Hubert Hayden,
  • Christian Loewe,
  • Wolf Eilenberg,
  • Christoph Neumayer,
  • Christine Brostjan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12247558
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 24
p. 7558

Abstract

Read online

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) share pathophysiological mechanisms including the activation of the fibrinolytic and innate immune system, which explains the analysis of D-dimer and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in both conditions. This study evaluates the diagnostic marker potential of both variables separately and as a combined MPO/D-dimer score for identifying patients with AAA versus healthy individuals or patients with PAD. Plasma levels of MPO and D-dimer were increased in PAD and AAA compared to healthy controls (median for MPO: 13.63 ng/mL [AAA] vs. 11.74 ng/mL [PAD] vs. 9.16 ng/mL [healthy], D-dimer: 1.27 μg/mL [AAA] vs. 0.58 μg/mL [PAD] vs. 0.38 μg/mL [healthy]). The combined MPO/D-dimer score (median 1.26 [AAA] vs. −0.19 [PAD] vs. −0.93 [healthy]) showed an improved performance in distinguishing AAA from PAD when analysed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve) for AAA against the pooled data of healthy controls + PAD: 0.728 [MPO], 0.749 [D-dimer], 0.801 [score]. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity ranged at 82.9% and 70.2% (for score cut-off = 0). These findings were confirmed for a separate collective of AAA patients with 35% simultaneous PAD. Thus, evaluating MPO together with D-dimer in a simple score may be useful for diagnostic detection and the distinction of AAA from athero-occlusive diseases like PAD.

Keywords