PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Performance of a commercial multi-sensor wearable (Fitbit Charge HR) in measuring physical activity and sleep in healthy children.

  • Job G Godino,
  • David Wing,
  • Massimiliano de Zambotti,
  • Fiona C Baker,
  • Kara Bagot,
  • Sarah Inkelis,
  • Carina Pautz,
  • Michael Higgins,
  • Jeanne Nichols,
  • Ty Brumback,
  • Guillaume Chevance,
  • Ian M Colrain,
  • Kevin Patrick,
  • Susan F Tapert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237719
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 9
p. e0237719

Abstract

Read online

PurposeThis study sought to assess the performance of the Fitbit Charge HR, a consumer-level multi-sensor activity tracker, to measure physical activity and sleep in children.Methods59 healthy boys and girls aged 9-11 years old wore a Fitbit Charge HR, and accuracy of physical activity measures were evaluated relative to research-grade measures taken during a combination of 14 standardized laboratory- and field-based assessments of sitting, stationary cycling, treadmill walking or jogging, stair walking, outdoor walking, and agility drills. Accuracy of sleep measures were evaluated relative to polysomnography (PSG) in 26 boys and girls during an at-home unattended PSG overnight recording. The primary analyses included assessment of the agreement (biases) between measures using the Bland-Altman method, and epoch-by-epoch (EBE) analyses on a minute-by-minute basis.ResultsFitbit Charge HR underestimated steps (~11.8 steps per minute), heart rate (~3.58 bpm), and metabolic equivalents (~0.55 METs per minute) and overestimated energy expenditure (~0.34 kcal per minute) relative to research-grade measures (pConclusionsFitbit Charge HR had adequate sensitivity in classifying moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity and sleep, but had limitations in detecting wake, and was more accurate in detecting heart rate during sleep than during exercise, in healthy children. Further research is needed to understand potential challenges and limitations of these consumer devices.