Health Expectations (Oct 2019)

Using PROMs during routine medical consultations: The perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease and their health professionals

  • Olga C. Damman,
  • Marjolein E. A. Verbiest,
  • Suzanne I. Vonk,
  • Henk W. Berendse,
  • Bastiaan R. Bloem,
  • Martine C. de Bruijne,
  • Marjan J. Faber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12899
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 5
pp. 939 – 951

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The use of patient‐reported outcomes measures (PROMs), such as quality of life or symptoms like pain or fatigue, is increasingly embraced within patient‐centred care and shared decision making. Objectives To investigate: (a) how patients and health professionals think about using PROMs during routine medical consultations; (b) for which purpose(s), patients and health professionals want to use PROMs during those consultations; and (c) how patients interpret PROMs information presented in various formats. People with Parkinson's disease and their health professionals served as case example. Methods We performed semi‐structured interviews with patients (N = 13) and professionals (N = 7 neurologists; N = 7 physiotherapists). We also used a survey in which patients (N = 115) were shown six figures displaying different information types. Presentation formats of this information varied (line/bar graphs). Interpretation by patients, perceived usefulness of information, attitude towards using information during routine medical consultations and (hypothetical) decisions were assessed. Findings Patients and professionals were generally positive about using PROMs during medical consultations. Professionals stressed the opportunity to monitor changes in individual PROMs over time. Patients were primarily positive about aggregated PROMs to make treatment decisions. This information was also most often interpreted correctly, especially when presented through a line graph (90.1% correct). Professionals thought patients should take the initiative in discussing PROMs, whereas patients thought professionals should do so. Conclusion/Discussion When used in routine medical consultations, PROMs seem to have potential to support shared decision making and facilitate patient‐professional communication. However, training seems needed for both patients and professionals to facilitate actual discussion and proper interpretation.

Keywords