Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Sep 2015)

Expert and crowd-sourced validation of an individualized sleep spindle detection method employing complex demodulation and individualized normalization

  • Laura eRay,
  • Stéphane eSockeel,
  • Melissa eSoon,
  • Melissa eSoon,
  • Arnaud eBore,
  • Ayako eMyhr,
  • Bobby eStojanoski,
  • Rhodri eCusack,
  • Rhodri eCusack,
  • Adrian M Owen,
  • Adrian M Owen,
  • Julien eDoyon,
  • Julien eDoyon,
  • Stuart eFogel,
  • Stuart eFogel,
  • Stuart eFogel,
  • Stuart eFogel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00507
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

A spindle detection method was developed that: 1) extracts the signal of interest (i.e., spindle-related phasic changes in sigma) relative to ongoing background sigma activity using complex demodulation, 2) accounts for variations of spindle characteristics across the night, scalp derivations and between individuals, and 3) employs a minimum number of sometimes arbitrary, user-defined parameters. Complex demodulation was used to extract instantaneous power in the spindle band. To account for intra- and inter-individual differences, the signal was z-score transformed using a 60s sliding window, per channel, over the course of the recording. Spindle events were detected with a z-score threshold corresponding to a low probability (e.g., 99th percentile). Spindle characteristics, such as amplitude, duration and oscillatory frequency, were derived for each individual spindle following detection, which permits spindles to be subsequently and flexibly categorized as slow or fast spindles from a single detection pass. Spindles were automatically detected in 15 young healthy subjects. Two experts manually identified spindles from C3 during Stage 2 sleep, from each recording; one employing conventional guidelines, and the other, identifying spindles with the aid of a sigma (11-16 Hz) filtered channel. These spindles were then compared between raters and to the automated detection to identify the presence of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives. This method of automated spindle detection resolves or avoids many of the limitations that complicate automated spindle detection, and performs well compared to a group of non-experts, and importantly, has good external validity with respect to the extant literature in terms of the characteristics of automatically detected spindles.

Keywords