Comparison of Three Location Estimation Methods of an Autonomous Driving Robot for Underground Mines

Abstract

In this study, we compared the accuracy of three location estimation methods of an autonomous driving robot for underground mines: an inertial measurement unit with encoder (IMU + encoder) sensors, Light Detecting and Ranging with encoder (LiDAR + encoder) sensors, and IMU with LiDAR and encoder (IMU + LiDAR + encoder) sensors. An accuracy comparison experiment was conducted in an indoor laboratory composed of four sections (X-change, X-Y change, X-Z change, and Y-change sections) that simulated an underground mine. The robot’s location was estimated using each of the three location estimation methods as the autonomous driving robot moved, and the results accuracy was analyzed by comparing the estimated location with the robot’s actual location. From the results of the indoor experiments, the average estimation error of the IMU + LiDAR + encoder sensors was approximately 0.09 m, that of the IMU + encoder was 0.19 m, and that of the LiDAR + encoder was 0.81 m. In a field experiment, the average error of the IMU + LiDAR + encoder was approximately 0.11 m, that of the IMU + encoder was 0.17 m, and that of the LiDAR + encoder was 0.70 m. In conclusion, the IMU + LiDAR + encoder method, which uses three types of sensors, showed the highest accuracy in estimating the location of autonomous robots in an underground mine.

Keywords

• smart mining
• underground mine
• autonomous driving
• mine automation