Nuclear Materials and Energy (Oct 2022)
Dependence of particle and power dissipation on divertor geometry and plasma shaping in DIII-D small-angle-slot divertor
Abstract
Dedicated experiments in DIII-D find that magnetic shaping and divertor target geometry significantly affect the divertor plasma conditions and divertor detachment process in the small-angle-slot (SAS) divertor. The compact SAS divertor in DIII-D provides a good testbed for understanding the effects of a tightly closed divertor on particle and power dissipation, and for application to core–edge integration solutions. A longer outer leg facilitates the achievement of divertor dissipation in the SAS divertor, while a shorter leg leads to higher electron temperatures near the divertor target plate and requires higher upstream densities to achieve the same level of divertor detachment. In addition, with the ion B × ∇B drift away from the SAS divertor and the outer strike point (OSP) near the outer corner, the target temperature is lower for a particular upstream density than with the OSP on a slanted or flat surface, leading to lower heat flux even when the particle flux remains similar. In contrast, with the ion B × ∇B drift into the SAS divertor, a strike point at the inner slanted surface exhibits a lower upstream density to achieve divertor detachment than a strike point either at the outer corner or the outer slanted target. Experimental results and SOLPS-ITER simulations with full drifts suggest the strong interplay between drift flows and the neutral distribution resulted from target shaping. Furthermore, in-slot gas puffing has been shown to achieve global divertor detachment with an onset density about 10 % lower than that using main-chamber gas puffing when the outer strike point is placed at the inner slanted surface. Corresponding modelling reveals that the local gas puffing enhances the neutral ionization which potentially facilitates the achievement of divertor dissipation. However, such improvement diminishes when the strike point is at the outer corner, which also indicates the geometric dependence on divertor performance in the SAS divertor. Even with different strike point locations, complete divertor detachment with very low particle and heat fluxes at the divertor targets and a high confinement core with normalized energy confinement factor H98 > 1.0 can be simultanesouly achieved with the SAS divertor with ion B × ∇B drift into SAS divertor, demonstrating the benefit of a closed divertor for exploration of core–edge integration.