PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Blockade of IL-36 receptor signaling does not prevent from TNF-induced arthritis.

  • Anja Derer,
  • Bettina Groetsch,
  • Ulrike Harre,
  • Christina Böhm,
  • Jennifer Towne,
  • Georg Schett,
  • Silke Frey,
  • Axel J Hueber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101954
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 8
p. e101954

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION: Interleukin (IL)-36α is a newly described member of the IL-1 cytokine family with a known inflammatory and pathogenic function in psoriasis. Recently, we could demonstrate that the receptor (IL-36R), its ligand IL-36α and its antagonist IL-36Ra are expressed in synovial tissue of arthritis patients. Furthermore, IL-36α induces MAP-kinase and NFκB signaling in human synovial fibroblasts with subsequent expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. METHODS: To understand the pathomechanism of IL-36 dependent inflammation, we investigated the biological impact of IL-36α signaling in the hTNFtg mouse. Also the impact on osteoclastogenesis by IL-36α was tested in murine and human osteoclast assays. RESULTS: Diseased mice showed an increased expression of IL-36R and IL-36α in inflamed knee joints compared to wildtype controls. However, preventively treating mice with an IL-36R blocking antibody led to no changes in clinical onset and pattern of disease. Furthermore, blockade of IL-36 signaling did not change histological signs of TNF-induced arthritis. Additionally, no alteration on bone homeostasis was observed in ex vivo murine and human osteoclast differentiation assays. CONCLUSION: Thus we conclude that IL-36α does not affect the development of inflammatory arthritis.