PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Development of a tool for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses: Value of plasma fibrinogen.

  • Veronika Seebacher,
  • Stefanie Aust,
  • David D'Andrea,
  • Christoph Grimm,
  • Elisabeth Reiser,
  • Denise Tiringer,
  • Hannah Von Mersi,
  • Stephan Polterauer,
  • Alexander Reinthaller,
  • Samir Helmy-Bader

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182383
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 8
p. e0182383

Abstract

Read online

To develop a tool for individualized risk estimation of presence of cancer in women with adnexal masses, and to assess the added value of plasma fibrinogen.We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 906 patients with adnexal masses who underwent cystectomy or oophorectomy. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses including pre-operative plasma fibrinogen levels and established predictors were performed. A nomogram was generated to predict the probability of ovarian cancer. Internal validation with split-sample analysis was performed. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was then used to evaluate the clinical net benefit of the prediction model.Ovarian cancer including borderline tumours was found in 241 (26.6%) patients. In multivariate analysis, elevated plasma fibrinogen, elevated CA-125, suspicion for malignancy on ultrasound, and postmenopausal status were associated with ovarian cancer and formed the basis for the nomogram. The overall predictive accuracy of the model, as measured by AUC, was 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94). DCA revealed a net benefit for using this model for predicting ovarian cancer presence compared to a strategy of treat all or treat none.We confirmed the value of plasma fibrinogen as a strong predictor for ovarian cancer in a large cohort of patients with adnexal masses. We developed a highly accurate multivariable model to help in the clinical decision-making regarding the presence of ovarian cancer. This model provided net benefit for a wide range of threshold probabilities. External validation is needed before a recommendation for its use in routine practice can be given.