Frontiers in Neuroscience (May 2024)

Machine learning algorithms to the early diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders

  • Anna Ramos-Triguero,
  • Anna Ramos-Triguero,
  • Elisabet Navarro-Tapia,
  • Elisabet Navarro-Tapia,
  • Melina Vieiros,
  • Melina Vieiros,
  • Afrooz Mirahi,
  • Afrooz Mirahi,
  • Marta Astals Vizcaino,
  • Marta Astals Vizcaino,
  • Lucas Almela,
  • Leopoldo Martínez,
  • Leopoldo Martínez,
  • Óscar García-Algar,
  • Óscar García-Algar,
  • Vicente Andreu-Fernández,
  • Vicente Andreu-Fernández

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1400933
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionFetal alcohol spectrum disorders include a variety of physical and neurocognitive disorders caused by prenatal alcohol exposure. Although their overall prevalence is around 0.77%, FASD remains underdiagnosed and little known, partly due to the complexity of their diagnosis, which shares some symptoms with other pathologies such as autism spectrum, depression or hyperactivity disorders.MethodsThis study included 73 control and 158 patients diagnosed with FASD. Variables selected were based on IOM classification from 2016, including sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis test for quantitative factors, Chi-square test for qualitative variables, and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for predictions.ResultsThis study explores the application ML in diagnosing FASD and its subtypes: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), partial FAS (pFAS), and Alcohol-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ARND). ML constructed a profile for FASD based on socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological data from children with FASD compared to a control group. Random Forest (RF) model was the most efficient for predicting FASD, achieving the highest metrics in accuracy (0.92), precision (0.96), sensitivity (0.92), F1 Score (0.94), specificity (0.92), and AUC (0.92). For FAS, XGBoost model obtained the highest accuracy (0.94), precision (0.91), sensitivity (0.91), F1 Score (0.91), specificity (0.96), and AUC (0.93). In the case of pFAS, RF model showed its effectiveness, with high levels of accuracy (0.90), precision (0.86), sensitivity (0.96), F1 Score (0.91), specificity (0.83), and AUC (0.90). For ARND, RF model obtained the best levels of accuracy (0.87), precision (0.76), sensitivity (0.93), F1 Score (0.84), specificity (0.83), and AUC (0.88). Our study identified key variables for efficient FASD screening, including traditional clinical characteristics like maternal alcohol consumption, lip-philtrum, microcephaly, height and weight impairment, as well as neuropsychological variables such as the Working Memory Index (WMI), aggressive behavior, IQ, somatic complaints, and depressive problems.DiscussionOur findings emphasize the importance of ML analyses for early diagnoses of FASD, allowing a better understanding of FASD subtypes to potentially improve clinical practice and avoid misdiagnosis.

Keywords