Kidney Medicine (May 2024)

Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study

  • Carlijn G.N. Voorend,
  • Noeleen C. Berkhout-Byrne,
  • Leti van Bodegom-Vos,
  • Adry Diepenbroek,
  • Casper F.M. Franssen,
  • Hanneke Joosten,
  • Simon P. Mooijaart,
  • Willem Jan W. Bos,
  • Marjolijn van Buren,
  • Arjan van Alphen,
  • Noeleen Berkhout-Byrne,
  • Fenna van Breda,
  • Marjolijn van Buren,
  • Henk Boom,
  • Willem Jan Bos,
  • Adry Diepenbroek,
  • Marielle Emmelot-Vonk,
  • Casper Franssen,
  • Carlo Gaillard,
  • Nel Groeneweg-Peeters,
  • Bettie Hoekstra,
  • Nienke Hommes,
  • Francoise Hoornaar,
  • Hanneke Joosten,
  • Joep Lagro,
  • Elisabeth Litjens,
  • Femke Molenaar,
  • Simon Mooijaart,
  • Aegida Neradova,
  • Mike Peters,
  • Michelle Troost,
  • Wilma Veldman,
  • Carlijn Voorend,
  • Lidwien Westerbos,
  • Carlijne Westerman-van der Wijden,
  • Judith Wierdsma

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 5
p. 100809

Abstract

Read online

Rationale & Objective: Older people with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex health care needs. Geriatric evaluation preceding decision making for kidney replacement is recommended in guidelines, but implementation is lacking in routine care. We aimed to evaluate implementation of geriatric assessment in CKD care. Study Design: Mixed methods implementation study. Setting & Participants: Dutch nephrology centers were approached for implementation of geriatric assessment in patients aged ≥70 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Quality Improvement Activities/Exposure: We implemented a consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment: a patient questionnaire and professionally administered test set comprising 16 instruments covering functional, cognitive, psychosocial, and somatic domains and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes: We aimed for implementation in 10 centers and 200 patients. Implementation was evaluated by (i) perceived enablers and barriers of implementation, including integration in work routines (Normalization Measure Development Tool) and (ii) relevance of the instruments to routine care for the target population. Analytical Approach: Variations in implementation practices were described based on field notes. The postimplementation survey among health care professionals was analyzed descriptively, using an explanatory qualitative approach for open-ended questions. Results: Geriatric assessment was implemented in 10 centers among 191 patients. Survey respondents (n = 71, 88% response rate) identified determinants that facilitated implementation, ie, multidisciplinary collaboration (with geriatricians) -meetings and reports and execution of assessments by nurses. Barriers to implementation were patient illiteracy or language barrier, time constraints, and patient burden. Professionals considered geriatric assessment sufficiently integrated into work routines (mean, 6.7/10 ± 2.0 [SD]) but also subject to improvement. Likewise, the relevance of geriatric assessment for routine care was scored as 7.8/10 ± 1.2. The Clinical Frailty Score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were perceived as the most relevant instruments. Limitations: Selection bias of interventions’ early adopters may limit generalizability. Conclusions: Geriatric assessment could successfully be integrated in CKD care and was perceived relevant to health care professionals. Plain-Language Summary: The number of older persons with kidney failure is increasing, many of whom have cognitive decline or are dependent on others for daily life tasks. These problems are often overlooked but relevant for future treatment choices, and they affect quality of life. We asked 10 health care centers to use tests and questionnaires to identify these issues, thus being able to offer additional support. We learned that it is possible to use these assessments in practice and that professionals found them relevant. Collaboration with geriatric departments was perceived valuable. However, there are also challenges, such as not having enough time and personnel and burden to patients. Understanding these possibilities and challenges is crucial for improving care for older patients with kidney failure.

Keywords