Revisiting interseismic deformation in Nankai: focusing on slip-deficit accumulation in the ETS zone and comparison with Cascadia

Abstract

Abstract Various stress-releasing phenomena, such as episodic tremor and slip (ETS) and low-frequency earthquakes, occur at the downdip seismogenic zone in southwest Japan. However, it is unclear how much net stress and slip deficit accumulate at these depths during the interseismic phase. Here, we perform both elastic and viscoelastic earthquake-cycle forward models and reassess the locking state in Nankai from a synthesized perspective with the aid of geodetic modeling results. Our results suggest that the overestimation of the locking depth due to ignoring Earth’s viscoelasticity is much smaller (less than 5 km) in this early interseismic subduction zone compared to that (~ 10 km) of late-interseismic margins. Considering viscoelastic modeling results and other physical arguments, the preferred steady-state viscosities for the continental and oceanic mantle are 5 × 1019 Pa s and 1020 Pa s, respectively. We find a clear trade-off between the full locking depth and the width of the transition zone when explaining both horizontal and vertical geodetic data, demanding other data to further resolve this inherent ambiguity. Unlike in Cascadia, partial megathrust locking in Nankai likely penetrates into the ETS zone, leaving no intervening gap between the shallow megathrust, where hosts large earthquakes, and the ETS zone. Assuming locking extends into the downdip of the ETS zone (i.e., 40 km), we propose a preferred viscoelastic locking model with a full locking depth of 18 km and a broad transition zone spanning a 22-km depth range. In this model, the downdip half portion of the transition zone corresponds to the ETS zone, which can accumulate certain slip deficit in a largely creeping and partially locked state. However, most of the accumulated slip deficit in the ETS zone may be accommodated aseismically simultaneously by stress-releasing phenomena, leaving limited to no budget to release during future megathrust earthquakes. We suggest that precise documentation of total slip during slow slip events, along with refinement of viscoelastic locking models, will provide new insights into the net slip budget available in the ETS zone. This will help assess the potential of future coseismic and/or postseismic slip penetrating into the ETS zone in Nankai, Cascadia and other subduction zones. Graphical Abstract

Keywords

• Nankai and Cascadia subduction zone
• ETS zone
• Interseismic locking state
• Slip-deficit accumulation
• Finite-element modeling