Eye Tracking-Based Characterization of Fixations during Reading in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abstract

An efficient mode of evaluation for eye movements is the use of objective eye tracking systems combined with subjective tests (NSUCO or DEM), which are easily applicable across all age groups and in eye care clinical settings. The objective of this study was to characterize fixations during reading in two groups: a group of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDG, 24 children, age: 6–12 years) and a group of children with oculomotor anomalies but without NDD (OAG, 24 children, age: 6–12 years). The results obtained were compared with those from a control group (CG, 20 children, age: 6–12 years). Specifically, the outcomes obtained with two subjective score systems, the Northeastern State University College of Optometry’s Oculomotor (NSUCO) test and the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test, were compared with the objective analysis obtained through a commercially available eye tracker (Tobii Eye X, Tobii, Stockholm, Sweden). Specialized analysis software, namely Clinical Eye Tracker 2020 (Thomson Software Solutions, Welham Green, UK), was used. It was found that children with NDD had impaired oculomotor skills. A higher number of regressions, more fixations, and longer durations of fixations appear to be characteristic signs of this population group. Additionally, children with NDD took longer to complete the DEM test, as well as exhibiting more errors. The use of objective videoculographic systems for eye tracking and subjective tests like the NSUCO or DEM are good tools to assess saccadic movements, allowing the detection of oculomotor abnormalities in children with NDD.

Keywords

• fixation
• oculomotor disfunction
• eye tracker
• dyslexia
• attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
• developmental coordination disorder