Internet Interventions (Sep 2021)

Reasons for not reaching or using web-based self-management applications, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, in the context of a randomised controlled trial

  • A. van der Hout,
  • C.F. van Uden-Kraan,
  • K. Holtmaat,
  • F. Jansen,
  • B.I. Lissenberg-Witte,
  • G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen,
  • J.A. Hardillo,
  • R.J. Baatenburg de Jong,
  • N.L. Tiren-Verbeet,
  • D.W. Sommeijer,
  • K. de Heer,
  • C.G. Schaar,
  • R.J.E. Sedee,
  • K. Bosscha,
  • M.W.M. van den Brekel,
  • J.F. Petersen,
  • M. Westerman,
  • J. Honings,
  • R.P. Takes,
  • I. Houtenbos,
  • W.T. van den Broek,
  • R. de Bree,
  • P. Jansen,
  • S.E.J. Eerenstein,
  • C.R. Leemans,
  • J.M. Zijlstra,
  • P. Cuijpers,
  • L.V. van de Poll-Franse,
  • I.M. Verdonck-de Leeuw

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25
p. 100429

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The web-based self-management application Oncokompas was developed to support cancer survivors to monitor health-related quality of life and symptoms (Measure) and to provide tailored information (Learn) and supportive care options (Act). In a previously reported randomised controlled trial (RCT), 68% of 655 recruited survivors were eligible, and of those 45% participated in the RCT. Among participants of the RCT that were randomised to the intervention group, 52% used Oncokompas as intended. The aim of this study was to explore reasons for not participating in the RCT, and reasons for not using Oncokompas among non-users, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among users. Methods: Reasons for not participating were assessed with a study-specific questionnaire among 243 survivors who declined participation. Usage was investigated among 320 participants randomised to the intervention group of the RCT via system data and a study-specific questionnaire that was assessed during the 1 week follow-up (T1) assessment. Results: Main reasons for not participating were not interested in participation in scientific research (40%) and not interested in scientific research and Oncokompas (28%). Main reasons for not being interested in Oncokompas were wanting to leave the period of being ill behind (29%), no symptom burden (23%), or lacking internet skills (18%). Out of the 320 participants in the intervention group 167 (52%) used Oncokompas as intended. Among 72 non-users, main reasons for not using Oncokompas were no symptom burden (32%) or lack of time (26%). Among 248 survivors that activated their account, satisfaction and user-friendliness were rated with a 7 (scale 0–10). Within 3 (IQR 1–4) sessions, users selected 32 (IQR 6–37) topics. Main reasons for not using healthcare options in Act were that the information in Learn was already sufficient (44%) or no supportive care needs (32%). Discussion: Main reasons for not reaching or using Oncokompas were no symptom burden, no supportive care needs, or lack of time. Users selected many cancer-generic and tumour-specific topics to address, indicating added value of the wide range of available topics.

Keywords