Surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession versus recess-resect in children with convergence insufficiency type intermittent exotropia

Abstract

Abstract To determine the efficacy of unilateral lateral rectus recession (ULR) for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-type IXT), we compared surgical outcomes following ULR and recess‒resect (RR) procedures for CI-type IXT. In this retrospective study, medical records of 57 children who underwent ULR (n = 30) or RR (n = 27) for CI-type IXT of less than 25 PD at distance with a postoperative follow-up of 6 months or more were reviewed. Surgical success was defined as an alignment between 10 PD exodeviation and 5 PD esodeviation at distance and near fixation. The postoperative exodeviation showed no significant difference between the two groups at the last follow-up. A significant reduction in the mean near-distance difference was achieved postoperatively in both groups: from 5.4 PD preoperatively to 2.5 at last follow-up after ULR, and from 8.2 to 2.4 after RR (both p = 0.001). However, this difference between ULR and RR was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The success rate at the last follow-up was 63.3% for ULR and 70.4% for RR (p = 0.574). ULR was found to be an effective treatment for CI-type IXT, with similar surgical outcomes to RR.