Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation

Abstract

Abstract Background In patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy without surgical clip implantation, the accuracy of tumor bed identification and the consistency of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation under computed tomography (CT) simulation remain suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) simulation on delineations by assessing interobserver variability (IOV). Methods Preoperative MR and postoperative CT simulations were performed in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with no surgical clips implanted. Custom immobilization pads were used to ensure the same supine position. Three radiation oncologists independently delineated the CTV of tumor bed on the images acquired from MR and CT simulation registration and CT simulation alone. Cavity visualization score (CVS) was assigned to each patient based on the clarity of the tumor bed on CT simulation images. IOV was indicated by generalized conformity index (CIgen), denoted as CIgen−CT and CIgen−MR/CT, and the distance between the centroid of mass (dCOM), denoted as dCOMCT and dCOMMR/CT. The variation of IOV in different CVS subgroups was analyzed. Results A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of maximum pathological diameter of the tumors in all patients were 1.55 (0.80–1.92) cm. No statistical significance was found between the volumes of CTVs on CT simulation and on MR/CT simulation registration images (p = 0.387). CIgen−MR/CT was significantly larger than CIgen−CT (p = 0.005). dCOMMR/CT was significantly smaller than dCOMCT (p = 0.037). The median and IQR of CVS in all patients were 2.34 (2.00–3.08). The difference of CIgen between CIgen−MR/CT and CIgen−CT was larger in the low CVS group (p = 0.016). The difference of dCOM showed a decreasing trend when CVS was lower, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.095). Conclusions For patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery without surgical clip implantation, the use of preoperative MR simulation in delineating the CTV of tumor bed decreased the IOV among observers. The consistency of tumor bed identification was improved especially in cases where the margins of tumor bed were challenging to visualize on CT simulation images. The study findings offer potential benefits in reducing local recurrence and minimizing tissue irritation in the surrounding areas. Future investigation in a larger patient cohort to validate our results is warranted.

Keywords

• Breast cancer
• Radiotherapy
• Magnetic resonance simulation
• Target volume delineation
• Interobserver variability