Geosciences (Aug 2021)

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a Masonry Arch Bridge Accounting for Damage Evolution

  • Daniela Addessi,
  • Cristina Gatta,
  • Mariacarla Nocera,
  • Domenico Liberatore

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11080343
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 8
p. 343

Abstract

Read online

This study investigates the nonlinear dynamic response of the masonry bridge ‘Ponte delle Torri’ in Spoleto, aiming at assessing the seismic performance of the structure and evaluating the occurring damaging mechanisms. A 3D Finite Element (FE) macromechanical procedure implemented in the FE program FEAP is adopted to model the bridge. To reproduce the typical nonlinear microcracking process evolving in masonry material when subjected to external loads, an isotropic damage model is used. This is based on a scalar damage variable introduced in the stress-strain constitutive law and equally degrading all the components of the elastic constitutive operator. A nonlocal integral definition of the damage associated variable, that is the equivalent strain measure governing its evolution, is adopted to overcome the mesh dependency problems of the FE solution typically occurring in the presence of strain softening behavior. Based on the results of a recent study by some of the authors, a single equivalent pier is analyzed, whose geometry and boundary conditions are selected so that its response can provide useful information on the out-of-plane dynamic behavior of the overall bridge. To perform the seismic assessment, a set of recorded accelerograms is properly selected to simulate the seismic history of the Spoleto site. The nonlinear dynamic response of the structure is evaluated and monitored in terms of top displacement time history, evolution of the global damage index, and distribution of the damage variable. First, a set of analyses is performed by imposing the selected ground motions one by one on the initial undamaged configuration for the structure with the aim of emphasizing the damaging effects on its dynamic response. Then, the accelerograms are arranged in sequence to reproduce the seismic history of the site and analyze the influence of accumulated damage on the dynamic amplification of the response. A critical comparison of the bridge response to the sequence of accelerograms and the single records is made, and the interaction between the damaged structure dynamic response and the signal characteristic is highlighted, as well.

Keywords