HIV awareness and prevention strategies among transgender women in the Eastern and Southern United States: findings from the LITE Study

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Transgender women (TW) experience an increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition. This study identified patterns of HIV awareness and prevention strategies used by TW who were not living with HIV. Methods Data were drawn from a baseline survey of the LITE Study, a multi‐site cohort of TW in Eastern and Southern United States (March 2018–August 2020). We conducted a latent class analysis to identify classes of HIV awareness and prevention strategies among TW who reported past 12‐month sexual activity (N = 958) using 10 variables spanning HIV knowledge, receipt and use of HIV prevention strategies, and sexual practices. Due to differences across the cohort arms, classes were estimated separately for TW enrolled in site‐based versus online study arms. We identified demographic characteristics, gender‐affirming indicators and HIV vulnerabilities associated with class membership. Results Four parallel classes emerged: class 1 “limited strategies—less sexually active” (15% and 9%, site‐based and online, respectively), class 2 “limited strategies—insertive sex” (16%/36%), class 3 “limited strategies—receptive sex” (33%/37%) and class 4 “multiple strategies—insertive and receptive sex” (36%/18%). Across all classes, condomless sex, pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)/post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prevention knowledge and awareness were high but reported PrEP/PEP use was low. Compared with class 1, membership in class 4 was associated with being a person of colour (site‐based OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.15–4.00, online OR = 4.54, 95% CI = 1.09–18.81) increased odds of self‐perceived medium‐to‐high HIV risk (site‐based OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 2.17–7.80, online OR = 11.73, 95% CI = 2.98–46.13), sexually transmitted infections (STI) diagnosis (site‐based OR = 6.69, 95% CI = 3.42–13.10, online OR = 8.46, 95% CI = 1.71–41.78), current sex work (site‐based OR = 6.49, 95% CI = 2.61–16.11, online OR = 10.25, 95% CI = 1.16–90.60) and 2–4 sexual partners in the last 3 months (site‐based OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.33–5.13). Class 3, compared with class 1, had increased odds of current sex work partners (site‐based OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.19–8.07) and of having 2–4 sexual partners in the last 3 months (site‐based OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 1.85–7.39). Conclusions TW have varied HIV awareness and prevention strategy utilization, with clear gaps in the uptake of prevention strategies. Algorithms derived from latent class membership may be used to tailor HIV prevention interventions for different subgroups and those reached through facility‐based or digital methods.

Keywords

• transgender women
• gender diverse
• HIV prevention strategies
• latent class analysis
• PrEP
• PEP