Journal of Hematology & Oncology (Jul 2021)

Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

  • Fulvia Pimpinelli,
  • Francesco Marchesi,
  • Giulia Piaggio,
  • Diana Giannarelli,
  • Elena Papa,
  • Paolo Falcucci,
  • Antonio Spadea,
  • Martina Pontone,
  • Simona Di Martino,
  • Valentina Laquintana,
  • Antonia La Malfa,
  • Enea Gino Di Domenico,
  • Ornella Di Bella,
  • Gianluca Falzone,
  • Fabrizio Ensoli,
  • Branka Vujovic,
  • Aldo Morrone,
  • Gennaro Ciliberto,
  • Andrea Mengarelli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01130-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In a population of 42 Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, all on systemic active treatment, the likelihood of responding to anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine at 2 weeks after the second dose was significantly lower in the ten patients with myelofibrosis compared to the 32 with essential thrombocythemia (n = 17) and polycythemia vera (n = 15) grouped together, both in terms of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and seroprotection rates (32.47 AU/mL vs 217.97 AU/mL, p = 0.003 and 60% vs 93.8%, p = 0.021, respectively). Ruxolitinib, which was the ongoing treatment in five patients with myelofibrosis and three with polycythemia vera, may be implicated in reducing vaccine immunogenicity (p = 0.076), though large prospective study is needed to address this issue.

Keywords