Nature Communications (Jun 2023)

Using mortuary and burial data to place COVID-19 in Lusaka, Zambia within a global context

  • Richard J. Sheppard,
  • Oliver J. Watson,
  • Rachel Pieciak,
  • James Lungu,
  • Geoffrey Kwenda,
  • Crispin Moyo,
  • Stephen Longa Chanda,
  • Gregory Barnsley,
  • Nicholas F. Brazeau,
  • Ines C. G. Gerard-Ursin,
  • Daniela Olivera Mesa,
  • Charles Whittaker,
  • Simon Gregson,
  • Lucy C. Okell,
  • Azra C. Ghani,
  • William B. MacLeod,
  • Emanuele Del Fava,
  • Alessia Melegaro,
  • Jonas Z. Hines,
  • Lloyd B. Mulenga,
  • Patrick G. T. Walker,
  • Lawrence Mwananyanda,
  • Christopher J. Gill

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39288-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Reported COVID-19 cases and associated mortality remain low in many sub-Saharan countries relative to global averages, but true impact is difficult to estimate given limitations around surveillance and mortality registration. In Lusaka, Zambia, burial registration and SARS-CoV-2 prevalence data during 2020 allow estimation of excess mortality and transmission. Relative to pre-pandemic patterns, we estimate age-dependent mortality increases, totalling 3212 excess deaths (95% CrI: 2104–4591), representing an 18.5% (95% CrI: 13.0–25.2%) increase relative to pre-pandemic levels. Using a dynamical model-based inferential framework, we find that these mortality patterns and SARS-CoV-2 prevalence data are in agreement with established COVID-19 severity estimates. Our results support hypotheses that COVID-19 impact in Lusaka during 2020 was consistent with COVID-19 epidemics elsewhere, without requiring exceptional explanations for low reported figures. For more equitable decision-making during future pandemics, barriers to ascertaining attributable mortality in low-income settings must be addressed and factored into discourse around reported impact differences.