Journal of Medical Internet Research (Oct 2024)

Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation

  • Samuel S Nordberg,
  • Brittany A Jaso-Yim,
  • Pratha Sah,
  • Keke Schuler,
  • Mara Eyllon,
  • Mariesa Pennine,
  • Georgia H Hoyler,
  • J Ben Barnes,
  • Lily Hong Murillo,
  • Heather O'Dea,
  • Laura Orth,
  • Elizabeth Rogers,
  • George Welch,
  • Gabrielle Peloquin,
  • Soo Jeong Youn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/54528
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26
p. e54528

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIn the United States, innovation is needed to address the increasing need for mental health care services and widen the patient-to-provider ratio. Despite the benefits of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), they have not been effective in addressing patients’ behavioral health challenges as stand-alone treatments. ObjectiveThis study evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of precision behavioral health (PBH), a digital-first behavioral health care model embedded within routine primary care that refers patients to an ecosystem of evidence-based DMHIs with strategically placed human support. MethodsPatient demographic information, triage visit outcomes, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measure, enrollment, and engagement with the DMHIs were analyzed using data from the electronic health record and vendor-reported data files. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the implementation and clinical effectiveness outcomes of PBH. ResultsPBH had a 47.58% reach rate, defined as patients accepting the PBH referral from their behavioral health integrated clinician. PBH patients had high DMHI registration rates (79.62%), high activation rates (76.54%), and high retention rates at 15 days (57.69%) and 30 days (44.58%) compared to literature benchmarks. In total, 74.01% (n=168) of patients showed clinical improvement, 22.47% (n=51) showed no clinical change, and 3.52% (n=8) showed clinical deterioration in symptoms. PBH had high adoption rates, with behavioral health integrated clinicians referring on average 4.35 (SD 0.46) patients to PBH per month and 90%-100% of clinicians (n=12) consistently referring at least 1 patient to PBH each month. A third (32%, n=1114) of patients were offered PBH as a treatment option during their triage visit. ConclusionsPBH as a care model with evidence-based DMHIs, human support for patients, and integration within routine settings offers a credible service to support patients with mild to moderate mental health challenges. This type of model has the potential to address real-life access to care problems faced by health care settings.