Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open (Oct 2024)

Emergency physicians perspectives of state continuing medical education requirements for medical licensure

  • Marianne Gausche‐Hill,
  • Yachana Bhakta,
  • Michael C. Bond,
  • Sandra M. Schneider,
  • Jeffrey Druck,
  • Colleen E. Livingston,
  • Lisa Moreno‐Walton,
  • Jonathan S. Jones,
  • Melissa A. Barton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13314
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objectives This study aims to better understand the perspectives of emergency medicine physicians’ on the role that state‐mandated, topic‐specific continuing medical education (CME) plays in addressing knowledge gaps, its relevance to current emergency practice, its reported burden and costs of CME activities to emergency physicians, and its perceived improvement in patient care. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was designed by the Coalition of Board‐Certified Emergency Physicians (COBCEP) and distributed in February 2023 to all American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM)‐certified physicians. Statistical tests of significance (Pearson's chi‐square and Fisher's exact test) assessed the cost and time spent on CME as well as the perceived value placed on CME by ABEM‐certified physicians to improve patient care. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results There were 5562 (13.0%) responses from the 43656 physicians who received the survey—5506 responses were included for analysis. Over half of the physicians (53.0%) had more than 15 years of post‐residency practice experience. Most physicians (57.3%) spent less than $5,000 per year on obtaining CME. Most physicians practicing in states with state‐mandated, topic‐specific CME requirements believed that participation in ABEM continuing certification could be used to reduce the need for state‐mandated, topic‐specific CME requirements (83.6%) and state‐mandated, topic‐specific requirements were believed to be unlikely to improve patient care (70.8%). Conclusions Although well‐intended, state CME requirements may lack relevancy and can, at times, place an undue burden on emergency physicians. Tailoring CME requirements to increase relevance to their patient populations and reduce barriers to completing CME could enhance knowledge translation and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords