Efficacy of hemostatic gel for perioperative bleeding and prevention of delayed bleeding of cold snare polypectomy under anticoagulant

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aim A hemostatic gel, PuraStat (3‐D Matrix, Tokyo, Japan), is used for various gastrointestinal hemostasis. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of PuraStat for perioperative bleeding (POB) and prevention of delayed bleeding (DB) to colorectal cold snare polypectomy (CSP) with continuous anticoagulant. Methods This was a single‐center, retrospective study. Subjects were lesions of 2–9 mm under continuous anticoagulant from 2021 to 2023 and treated with PuraStat for POB. The definition of POB was bleeding which did not stop spontaneously by 1.0–1.5 min after resection and needed hemostasis. Successful hemostasis was defined as cessation of bleeding within 1.0–1.5 min after spraying PuraStat and the rate of it and risk factors of POB were analyzed. For comparison, cases receiving previous CSP without PuraStat were extracted from all cases with CSP (2018‐2021), and POB and DB rate (DBR) were analyzed after propensity score matching. Results One hundred twenty‐two lesions (91: direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), 31: warfarin) with anticoagulant were analyzed and the rate of successful hemostasis with PuraStat was 92.6% (DOAC/warfarin: 93.4%/80.6%, P = 0.01). The rate of DB was 0.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that significant risk factors about unsuccessful hemostasis for POB with PuraStat were lesion size 8–9 mm (P < 0.01), warfarin (P = 0.01), and combination of antiplatelet (P = 0.01). Regarding the comparison about CSP with/without PuraStat, the clipping rate and DBR were 8.5%/94.9% (P < 0.01) and 0%/1.7% (P = 1.0). Conclusion The effects of PuraStat for POB and DB in colorectal CSP with continuous anticoagulant were acceptable.

Keywords

• cold snare polypectomy
• colonoscopy
• colorectal polyps
• delayed bleeding
• perioperative bleeding