Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for non-maturing native arteriovenous fistulas according to the approach route (arterial vs. venous). Methods Eighty-five patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for non-maturing fistulas (63 radiocephalic and 22 brachiocephalic) between 2010 and 2019. Outcome variables such as procedural success, complications, and primary and secondary patency rates were analyzed from the patients’ demographic, angiographic, clinical, and hemodialysis records according to the approach route (venous access group, n = 53 and arterial access group, n = 32). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patency rates. Results The mean duration from fistula creation to fistulography was 78.4±51.4 days (range, 1–180 days). The anatomical and clinical success rates were 98.8% and 83.5%, respectively. Lesions were most commonly located at the juxta-anastomosis (55.3%). Accessory cephalic veins were observed in 16 patients. The primary patency rates were 83.9%, 71.9%, and 66.3% and the secondary patency rates were 98.6%, 95.9%, and 94.2% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. The degree of hypertension (P = 0.023), minimal preoperative vein size (P = 0.041), and increment in postoperative vein diameter were higher in the venous access group than in the arterial access group (P<0.01). The frequency of using cutting balloons (P = 0.026) and complication rate were higher in the arterial access group than in the venous access group (arterial access: 1 major, 8 minor; venous access: 4 minor; P = 0.015). Conclusions Aggressive evaluation and endovascular therapy can salvage most non-maturing fistulas. Transradial and distal radial approaches can be effective even for challenging lesions.