Silva Fennica (Jan 2020)

Re-calibrating stem volume models – is there change in the tree trunk form from the 1970s to the 2010s in Finland?

  • Kangas, Annika,
  • Henttonen, Helena,
  • Pitkänen, Timo,
  • Sarkkola, Sakari,
  • Heikkinen, Juha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10269
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 54, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

The tree stem volume models of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver and downy birch currently used in Finland are based on data collected during 1968–1972. These models include four different formulations of a volume model, with three different combinations of independent variables: 1) diameter at height of 1.3 m above ground (), 2) and tree height () and 3) , and upper diameter at height of 6 m (). In recent National Forest Inventories of Finland, a difference in the mean volume prediction between the models with and without the upper diameter as predictor has been observed. To analyze the causes of this difference, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was used to acquire a large dataset in Finland during 2017–2018. Field-measured predictors and volumes predicted using spline functions fitted to the TLS data were used to re-calibrate the current volume models. The trunk form is different in these two datasets. The form height is larger in the new data for all diameter classes, which indicates that the tree trunks are more slender than they used to be. One probable reason for this change is the increase in stand densities, which is at least partly due to changed forest management. In models with both and as predictors, the volume is smaller a given class in the data new data than in the old data, and vice versa for the diameter classes. The differences between the old and new models were largest with pine and smallest with birch.dbhdbhhdbhhd6dbhhh