Population Medicine (Jan 2021)

Qualitative evaluation of learning environment in Indian teaching dental institutions from the students’ perspective using focus group interviews

  • Viswa C. Chandu,
  • Srinivas Pachava,
  • Venkat Ramana Reddy Baddam,
  • Yamuna Marella,
  • Madhura Sai Tejaswini Panchumarti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/131263
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. January
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Introduction The perspectives of students towards their learning environment has seldom been in introspect in Indian dental institutions, which are against the advocacy of international dental education working groups. The aim of this study is to document students’ perceptions of their learning environment in two of the thirteen teaching dental institutions in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. Methods This qualitative study, involving focus group interviews, was conducted among undergraduate dental students in two teaching dental institutions in the state of Andhra Pradesh. Theoretical sampling was done with concurrent conduct of purposive sampling for focus group interviews and two researchers who participated in the presession were involved in moderating the interviews, which consisted of groups of six to eight participants. All the focus group interviews were audio-taped and transcribed. The transcripts were analyzed using general inductive approach to extract themes. Results Problems in lectures and in the clinical learning environment, dissatisfaction with evaluation processes and poor academic drive were identified as the major themes responsible for negative learning outcomes. Some of the responses given by the students highlighted their disinclination towards receiving feedback and emphasized the need to move away from the authoritarian approach in teacher–student interactions. Evaluation is a major domain where reforms are necessary, as opined by the students. Conclusions The perspectives of students towards the learning environment has seldom been in introspect in Indian dental institutions, which may have a substantial negative impact on students’ attitudes and efficiency.

Keywords