Effectiveness of the original trimetazidine MR in patients with stable coronary heart disease and angina attacks resistant to trimetazidine generics (ETALON study)

Abstract

Aim. To assess the clinical benefits of the original trimetazidine medication (Preductal® MR) in patients with stable coronary heart disease and angina attacks resistant to trimetazidine generics. Material and methods. The study included 112 patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD), who experienced angina attacks, despite the treatment with trimetazidine generics added to the standard CHD therapy (antiaggregants, statins, β-аadrenoblockers, ACE inhibitors). All participants received Preductal® MR (35 mg twice a day) instead of trimetazidine generics. The follow-up duration was 3 months. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the changes in angina attack incidence, short-acting nitrate consumption, and general status, using a visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, pharmaco-economic analysis of the treatment effectiveness was performed. Results. The replacement of trimetazidine generics with Preductal® MR was associated with a reduction in angina attack incidence by 63 % and in the number of nitroglycerine tablets/doses by 65 % (p<0,01). VAS score increased from 45,3±13,8 to 71,6±11,9 (р<0,0001). Preductal® MR therapy is the best pharmaco-economic option, since the ratio between weekly treatment costs (RUB) and the weekly number of prevented angina attacks is minimal for this original medication. Conclusion. In patients with stable CHD and angina attacks, resistant to trimetazidine generics, Preductal® МR therapy is associated with a significant reduction in angina attack incidence and consumption of short-acting nitrates. Preductal® MR is the most cost-effective medication, providing optimal effectiveness with minimal costs.

Keywords

• stable angina
• trimetazidine generics
• preductal mr